|
|
editors speak
ColumbiaKids
Last month we mentioned the fantastic new kid’s magazine launching in
August 2008 from the Washington State Historical Society:
ColumbiaKids. The plan is to bring a whole new twist to exploring
Pacific Northwest History. We liked the idea of this great new magazine
so much that we knew we had to find out more – and ColumbiaKids
Managing Editor (and head of education for the Washington State History
Museum) Stephanie Lile took time to help us understand this great
magazine better. I think you’ll find this interview as exciting as we
did.
KMW: The readers of Kid Magazine Writers are professional freelancers,
so naturally, their first interest is in getting content into
ColumbiaKids. What kind of content are you most hoping for?
SL: We are looking for articles and stories with lively, kid-friendly
language and a specific Pacific Northwest focus. Submissions that use
the “rock in water” analogy of construction—moving from a specific
Pacific Northwest subject on to its national and global ties (when
relevant) will get the most attention. We also want to receive articles
and stories that are well researched and that include about five solid
bibliographical sources. We ask for this not only for fact-checking
purposes, but also because we want to encourage kids to dig deeper by
giving them clues to do so.
KMW: Is there any specific department that you would be most excited
about seeing submissions for?
SL: They are all wide open. But perhaps the ones that we’d most like to
see people get creative with are the departments that push the dynamic
web medium. These include such departments as “Pod Puzzle” and
“Northwest Hot Spot.”
The Pod Puzzle is essentially an audio script that works best if posed
as a mystery with a resolution at the end. Then “Northwest Hot Spot,”
which can be an illustration, photograph, or historic image, is totally
open to writers who want to build on an image from a museum or personal
collection. In these cases, we ask that the writer supply permission and
credit information at the time of submission, and of course, any image
in the Washington State Historical Society collection is an easy option
as well. For this department, writers simply draft the clues for the
clickable hotspots (a street sign, house, sculpture, landscape feature
etc.) and write a short “reveal” that tells the reader where the image
is from and what is unique about that place.
KMW: Now, I know you would like to see finished manuscripts. If a writer
has an idea but wonders if it might be too recent or maybe not quite
"Pacific Northwest" enough -- can he/she query or do you really prefer
not to deal with queries at all? We want to help writers submit in
exactly the fashion you most prefer.
SL: Absolutely! If you’re wondering, write to us—send an
e-mail query for a quicker reply. I can usually get a sense
whether a story will work for us in two or three sentences.
KMW: I see that you will accept some short historical fiction, but of a
very specific sort. To keep you from drowning in historical fiction, can
you tell us exactly what you would want for "One Day in History?"
SL: I have to admit, the inclusion of this department was a difficult
“sell” to some of our staff members. Our mother publication, Columbia,
is a highly acclaimed journal of Pacific Northwest history written
largely by experts in their fields. It is strictly nonfiction, and so
the idea of including historical fiction was precarious for an
organization devoted to working with historical fact. After all, we’re
basically a bunch of history geeks who secretly delight in picking apart
books and films that don’t quite get the historical details right. :-)
All that said, however, studies have revealed (sadly) that kids tend to
learn more history outside of school than in school—and most of that
comes from historical fiction and film. Because of that, we have become
dedicated to helping teachers, writers, and filmmakers access
information that will make their works more historically accurate. We (ColumbiaKids’
editors and writers) have an obligation to our readers to do OUR
homework and present subjects in a truthful light—right down to the
shoes on a character’s feet and the sugar she uses in tea. For many
writers this is a true challenge. Hence, we begin with a single day in
history.
For the purposes of ColumbiaKids, stories that have a child as the
central character, that blend action with emotion, and include
well-researched historical detail will be winners for us. For example,
don’t write about the Chinese Expulsion or the great Seattle fire from
an adult’s point of view, make your main character be a child who
witnessed it.
Writers who are working on or who have published an historical novel set
in the Pacific Northwest may consider submitting an excerpt. We also ask
authors to include an end note that explains what aspects of the story
they chose to fictionalize and what they took from hard evidence. This
will help kids begin to understand how we as writers work with and
interpret information from the past.
KMW: Could you describe how the type of article a child might read in
Cobblestone or Cricket would be different when seen through your
magazine's vision for its readers? Would the only difference be location
-- or do you have further vision in mind?
SL: Quite honestly, because we are museum based, we lean toward stories
that get kids thinking about objects and images as sources of historical
evidence. That means starting with a story about a person, place, or
object grounded in the Pacific Northwest, then finding relationships
between that person, place, or object and others that are similar
further afield.
For example, a while back some kids came to me during a school visit in
Des Moines, Washington, and asked if I could help them research a brick
they had been using for home plate in their baseball games. I admit, I
was skeptical. It was a brick after all—about as ordinary an object as
you can find. But they were earnest and we began to research it anyway.
As we did, a strange web of connections emerged. From the well-worn
writing on the brick—which after much trial and error turned out be
MIZZOU/A.P. Green—we located the brick refractory in Columbia, Missouri.
From the name MIZZOU, we ascertained that the brick had been specially
developed by the Geology Department at University of Missouri at
Columbia, that MIZZOU was the nickname of the school, and that the
original version of the brick had been made for use by NASA at early
rocket launch sites. What’s more, that little yellow brick led us to
discover that Des Moines, Washington had been founded by people from Des
Moines, Iowa who had agreed to send supplies to help get the early
settlement started if it was given the mother-city’s name.
While I’m not proposing that everyone send us stories about bricks,
accurate details are important. We are not likely to accept a general
article about native baskets, for example, if it fails to include the
specific Northwest tribes who made them or tell how and where they were
used. We’re big on giving kids geographical references. It’s important
for kids to get a sense of where they are in relation to the subject of
the story, whether it’s fiction or nonfiction.
Most of all, in terms of overarching vision, we want kids to see that
exploring the past is fun and challenging. This magazine is as much for
a kid who lives in the Pacific Northwest as it is for a kid living in
Hong Kong. It was born out of a need expressed by children from all over
the country who write to us asking about the very people, places, and
objects of the Pacific Northwest that we hope to feature in ColumbiaKids.
KMW: Some of your short filler pieces sound fascinating. Can you tell me
more about your POD puzzles? -- I know a chance to do a little play will
excite a few of our readers. And the Northwest hot spot sounds like so
much fun, can you tell me a bit about these and how long those "fly out"
facts would be.
SL: The “Pod Puzzle” is one of those fun fillers that allow us to appeal
to kids who are better listeners than readers. We approach it as a
puzzle because we want to avoid the old “info dump” that sounds like
someone reading from a text book. We want nonfiction stories or legends
that invite the listener into another world—which, in our case, it’s
some point in Pacific Northwest history. For that reason, Pod Puzzles
can go in a multitude of directions, from single voice to many voices,
from music-based to poetry. It can be zippy in tone or it can be a
bedtime story. Because Pod Puzzles are audio recordings, there has to be
a distinct rhythm and flow to the piece, and writers should read their
work aloud before submitting it. We acknowledge that many children don’t
have people who read to them on a regular basis, so this is one small
way to offer them that experience.
While we hope many illustrators will submit to “Northwest Hot Spot,”
there are still many options for writers to use historic—and
modern—images. The idea is to present a picture of a place that has
about five to eight “hotspots” (technically termed “mouse-overs”) that
present short 10-25 word clues to the history, significance, and
geographic location of the place.
As another example, we have an exhibit in our History Lab Learning
Center called “Postcard Place” that challenges visitors to find the
modern version of a place depicted in an historic postcard. With this in
mind, we’d even be open to a “then and now” type of submission in which
kids would have to find the five to eight things in two different
pictures of the same place that have changed over time. So many fun
options!
KMW: Remind us again about how can writers get your writers guidelines.
And also, for an article to really interest you, what would you want to
see in terms of sources?
SL: Since we are in the midst of a complete redesign of our museum Web
site, information about ColumbiaKids is best
requested via e-mail. Once we have launched our new site, writers
will be able to obtain guidelines there. The other nice thing about
e-mailing us for guidelines is that you’ll be contacted later with the
option to become a founding subscriber to ColumbiaKids (did I mention
it’s free?).
KMW: What rights do you ask from your contributors?
SL: Like a couple of other online kids’ magazines, we buy First World
Electronic Rights and Archival Rights. This means that we accept
articles that have not been published on the internet before. These are
one-time rights with the Archival Right to keep them active as long as
we choose to in the context they were originally published in
ColumbiaKids. In certain instances, we may ask an author to sell us All
Rights.
KMW: What are your overall dreams for ColumbiaKids?
SL: We want to push the envelope. For us ColumbiaKids is a way to serve
one of our underserved audiences directly. It’s a way to help address
the literacy challenges young people face every day. It’s a place to try
new things and explore new ways of understanding our past. The e-zine
will allow us to tackle subjects more recent in our history (our main
exhibit hall currently only goes up to about 1950) while celebrating
people of all cultures and walks of life.
But first, we simply want to see the publication succeed. By that I mean
we want to see it be useful and inspiring to the kids and writers who
will ultimately make it unique and different. It is a publication that
is entirely dependent on sponsorship, so we want to make our
sponsors—and our writers, illustrators, and readers—proud to be
connected with it.

This page last updated on 02 February 2008
|